BladePipe vs. Fivetran-Features, Pricing and More (2025)
In today’s data-driven landscape, businesses rely heavily on efficient data integration platforms to consolidate and transform data from multiple sources. Two prominent players in this space are Fivetran and BladePipe, both offering solutions to automate and streamline data movement across cloud and on-premises environments.
This blog provides a clear comparison of BladePipe and Fivetran as of 2025, covering their core features, pricing models, deployment options, and suitability for different business needs.
Quick Intro
What is BladePipe?
BladePipe is a data integration platform known for its extremely low latency and high performance that facilitates efficient migration and sync of data across both on-premises and cloud databases. Founded in 2019, it’s built for analytics, microservices and AI-focused use cases that emphasizing real-time data.
The key features include：
- Real-time replication, with a latency less than 10 seconds.
- End-to-end pipeline for great reliability and easy maintenance.
- One-stop management of the whole lifecycle from schema evolution to monitoring and alerting.
- Zero-code RAG building for simpler and smarter AI.
What is Fivetran?
Fivetran is a global leader in automated data movement and is widely trusted by many companies. It offers a fully managed ELT (Extract-Load-Transform) service that automates data pipelines with prebuilt connectors, ensuring robust data sync and automatic adaptation to source schema changes.
The key features include：
- Managed ELT pipelines, automating the entire Extract-Load-Transform process.
- Extensive connectors (700+ prebuilt connectors).
- Strong data transformation ability with dbt integration and built-in models.
- Automatic schema handling, reducing human efforts.
Feature Comparison
| Features | BladePipe | Fivetran |
|---|---|---|
| Sync Mode | Real-time CDC-first/ETL | ELT/Batch CDC |
| Batch and Streaming | Batch and Streaming | Batch only |
| Sync Latency | ≤ 10 seconds | ≥ 1 minute |
| Data Connectors | 40+ connectors built by BladePipe | 700+ connectors, 450+ are Lite (API) connectors |
| Source Data Fetch | Pull and Push hybrid | Pull-based |
| Data Transformation | Built-in transformations and custom code | Post-load transformation and dbt integration |
| Schema Evolution | Strong support | Strong support |
| Verification & Correction | Yes | No |
| Deployment Options | Self-hosted/Cloud (BYOC) | Self-hosted/Hybrid/SaaS |
| Security | SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR | SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA |
| Support | Enterprise-level support | Tiered support (Standard, Enterprise, Business Critical) |
| SLA | Available | Available |
Pipeline Latency
Fivetran adopts batch-based CDC, which means the data is read in batch intervals. It offers a range of sync frequencies, from as low as 1 minute (for Enterprise/Business Critical plans) to 24 hours. That makes the latency to be around 10 minutes. Besides, it increases pressure to the source end.
BladePipe uses real-time Change Data Capture (CDC) for data integration. That means it instantly grab data changes from your source and deliver them to the destination within seconds. This approach is a big shift from traditional batch-based CDC methods. In BladePipe, real-time CDC works with nearly all of its 40+ connectors.
In summary, BladePipe outweighs Fivetran in terms of latency, ideal for use cases that requiring always fresh data.
Data Connectors
Fivetran offers an extensive library (700+) of pre-built connectors, covering databases, APIs, files and more. A variety of connectors satisfy diverse business needs. Among all the connectors, around 450 of them are lite connectors built for specific use cases with limited endpoints.
BladePipe offers over 40 pre-built connectors. It focuses on essential systems for real-time needs, like OLTPs, OLAPs, messaging tools, search engines, data warehouses/lakes, and vector databases. This makes it a great choice for real-time projects where getting fresh data quickly is a fundamental requirement.
In summary, Fivetran excels with its broad range of connectors, while BladePipe focuses on data delivery for critical real-time infrastructure. Choose the right tool that works for you.
Reliability
Fivetran's reliability has been a point of concern. We can find 15 or more incidents occurred per month in their status page, including connector failures, 3rd party service errors, and other service degradations. It even experienced an outage lasting more than 2 days.
BladePipe is built with production-grade reliability at its core. It provides real-time dashboards for monitoring every step of data movement. Alert notifications can be triggered for latency, failures, or data loss. That makes it easy to maintain pipelines and solve problems, enhancing reliability.
In summary, BladePipe shows a more reliable system performance than Fivetran, and its monitoring and alerting mechanism brings even stronger support for stable pipelines.
Support
Fivetran offers documentation, support portal, and email support for Standard plan. However, some customers complain about the long time waiting for response. Enterprise and Business Critical plans enjoy 1-hour support response, but the costs are much higher.
BladePipe offers a more white-glove support experience. For both Cloud and Enterprise customers, BladePipe provides the according SLAs. Its technical team works closely with clients during onboarding and when fine-tuning data pipelines.
In summary, both Fivetran and BladePipe provide documentation and technical support for better understanding and use.
Use Case Comparison
Based on the features stated above, the performance of the two tools varies in different use cases.
| Use Case | BladePipe | Fivetran |
|---|---|---|
| Data sync between relational databases | Excellent | Average |
| Data sync between online business databases (RDB, data warehouse, message, cache, search engine) | Excellent | Average |
| Data lakehouse support | Average | Average |
| SaaS sources support | Average | Excellent |
| Multi-cloud data sync | Excellent | Average |
Pricing Model Comparison
Pricing is a crucial consideration when evaluating data integration tools, especially for startups and organizations with extensive data replication needs. Fivetran and BladePipe employ significantly different pricing models.
Fivetran
Fivetran has four plans to consider: Free, Standard, Enterprise and Business Critical. The free plan offers a free usage for low-volumes (e.g., up to 500,000 MAR). The other three plans adopt MAR-based tiered pricing. See more details at the pricing page.
Besides, Fivetran separately charges for data transformation based on the models users run in a month, making the costs even higher.
As of March 2025, Fivetran's pricing model has been changed to a connector-level pricing. Pricing and discounts are often applied per individual connector instead of the entire account. This means if you have many connectors, your total cost might increase even if your overall data volume hasn't changed.
BladePipe
BladePipe offers two plans to choose:
- Cloud: $0.01 per million rows of full data and $10 per million rows of incremental data. You can easily evaluate the costs via the price calculator. It is available at AWS Marketplace.
- Enterprise: The costs are based on the number of pipelines and duration you need. Talk to the sales team on specific costs.
Summary
Here's a quick comparison of costs between BladePipe BYOC and Fivetran(Standard).
| Million Rows per Month | BladePipe* (BYOC) | Fivetran (Standard) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 M | $210 | $500+ |
| 10 M | $300 | $1350+ |
| 100 M | $1200 | $2900+ |
*: include one AWS EC2 t2.xlarge for BladePipe Worker, $200/month.
In summary, BladePipe is a better choice when it comes to costs, considering the following factors:
Cost-effectiveness: BladePipe is much more cheaper than Fivetran when moving the same amount of data. Besides, BladePipe doesn't charge for data transformation separately.
Cost Predictability: BladePipe's direct per-million-row pricing offers more immediate cost predictability, especially for large, consistent data volumes. Fivetran's MAR can be less predictable due to the nature of "active rows", the data transformation charge and the new connector-level pricing.
Final Thoughts
Choosing between Fivetran and BladePipe depends heavily on your organization's specific data integration needs and priorities. Fivetran provides extensive coverage of connectors and an automated ELT experience for analytics. BladePipe features real-time CDC, ideal for mission-critical data syncs. In terms of pricing, BladePipe is a cost-effective choice for start-ups and organizations with a tight budget.
Evaluate your specific data sources, latency requirements, budget, internal team resources, and desired level of support to make the most suitable choice.